Welcome

Readers write here

READERS MAY LOG IN AND CONTRIBUTE THEIR IDEAS HERE. WE WELCOME SUGGESTIONS AND CRITICISM. WE WANT TO GROW.
THOSE WHO WANT TO WRITE, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTRIBUTE IN THE SPACE PROVIDED. IT WILL HELP IF YOU CAN PLEASE MENTION YOUR E MAIL ID, SO THAT READERS CAN ALSO DIRECTLY COMMUNICATE WITH FELLOW PENSIONERS.

Name:
Email:
Website:
Subject:
Icon:
Message:
 
Antispam:
Verification:
What is zero plus three ?
 

There are 713 entries available on

< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

Dhanabalan (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 9:52 pm:

 7th bipadtitei
After all judges are also human being expecting flavours from a appointing authorities
We are slaves who cannot question the king if he errsone
 

Dhanabalan (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 9:50 pm:

 7th bipadtitei
After all judges are also human being expecting flavours from a appointing authorities
We are slaves who cannot question the king if he errsone
 

Dhanabalan (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 9:49 pm:

 7th bipadtitei
After all judges are also human being expecting flavours from a appointing authorities
We are slaves who cannot question the king if he errsone
 

Dhanabalan (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 7:08 pm:

 7th bipadtitei l
It is not law.hooliganism and muscle and money power. As written yesterday unless we change our approach we are bound to fail. For information of my colleagues in Chennai there r three groups. One group other than penfed has won .the case as.early as 2008. Egoism and too much reliance on ifbu has put the pensioners to the present day situation. Apart from this mudsliimgig by yester year leaders contribution
 

Dhanabalan (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 7:07 pm:

 7th bipadtitei l
It is not law.hooliganism and muscle and money power. As written yesterday unless we change our approach we are bound to fail. For information of my colleagues in Chennai there r three groups. One group other than penfed has won .the case as.early as 2008. Egoism and too much reliance on ifbu has put the pensioners to the present day situation. Apart from this mudsliimgig by yester year leaders contribution
 

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer wrote at 27-07-2015 6:34 pm:

 DELHI HIGH COURT CASE No.1875/2013
Dear Friends,

What do you mean by "seniority". According to what our beloved teachers and seniors taught us it is from top to bottom. But in the case of Delhi High Court, it is from bottom to top.

2. Please refer to the cause list dated 28.07.2015 of Delhi High Court. Case No. WP(C) 4931/2005 which appeared as item No,5 has been disposed of although our case which is figuring as item No.1A has not yet been taken up for final hearing.

3. Instructions of the Supreme Court are not applicable to Delhi High Court. Rules and regulations are applicable to the common man only and tax payer and not to politicians, police and judiciary.

4. Long Live Indian Judiciary! Long Live Rule of Law!

Yours faithfully,

M.Gopalakrishna Iyer.
 

Sundar Ghosh wrote at 27-07-2015 8:40 am:

 SBI epic blunder
State Bank Of India (SBI) might be reputed and all but they still ended up making one of the most epic blunders till date.
http://www.storypick.com/kanpur-womans-sbi-bank-account/
 

Dhanabalan wrote at 27-07-2015 6:56 am:

 7th bipadtitei
Dear colleagues. Tomorrow will never come.
Kindly shed expectations. Divided we fall
Initiate action with change in appoach. We are definite to win
Regards
 

Jwala prasad tiwari wrote at 27-07-2015 4:01 am:

 Pension slip not received on email
Thanks for reply Mr saxena sahab sir I have already registered both mobile number& email I'd inspite of that not being received this is for your information:-
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 3:25 am:

 COURT CASE W.P(C) 1875/2013
AS PER WEB SITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT THE ABOVE NOTED COURT CASE HAS BEEN LISTED ON THE 28TH JULY,2015 BEFORE A DOUBLE BENCH NO5.
K.R.SAINI
 

Jayakrishnan T.V. wrote at 27-07-2015 2:54 am:

 DELHI HIGH COURT CASE - SBI PENSIONERS' FEDERATION vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS - W.P. (C) 1875/2013
27th July 2015 came and gone. Our case stands as it is. Let us have hopes on tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow..............
I am posting this at 5.25 p.m. on 27th July 2015
 

Sudhir Suman Kumaria (Chandigarh Circle) (Website) wrote at 27-07-2015 1:23 am:

 IInd Innings-Jan–Mar 2015
Dear Comrade
We have uploaded the following file(s), which you can view/download from SBI Pensioners’ Association (Chandigarh Circle) official website: http://www.sbipensionerschd.com/

1. IInd Innings-Jan–Mar 2015.

With Regards,


Jai Ram Gupta
General Secretary
SBI Pensioners' Association
(Chandigarh Circle)
 

Anil K Saxena wrote at 27-07-2015 12:48 am:

 Jwala prasad tiwari wrote at 26-07-2015 7:49 pm: Pension slip not received on email
Please contact your pension paying Branch, and get your email id alongwith mobile number registerd.
 

V MADHAVAN wrote at 27-07-2015 12:02 am:

 PENSION MATTER S.RAJAGOPALAN ON 24-07-2015
1. The despair recorded on 24 07 2015 by Sri S Rajagopalan over the tardy progress in the Writ 1875/2013, as well reflects the feelings of the other pensioners of 1997 2002. But the SC in their order dated 27 02 2013 has not instructed or directed the DHC in handling the Writ transferred. “13. -- request the learned Chief Justice to assign the writ petition before a Bench of his choice for early disposal of the matter, at any rate within the outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of the records.” The Plaintiff chose to file amended prayers on the basis of SBI Employees' Pension Fund Regulation 2014. The ‘pleadings are complete’ position recorded in the order of SC would have undergone a drastic change. Thereafter one could not find fault with the judiciary. Revised petition may invite every other time consuming court procedure.
2. The order in WP (C) 184 of 2011 discloses that a procedure for filing Applications for early hearings obtains in the courts. The men in direct dialogue with the Advocates in WP (C) 1875 of 2013 could request the advocates to file an application for early hearing without irritating and antagonising the presiding officers. Because interested parties are more than SRCTZN. They are mostly SEPTUAGENARIANS AND OCTOGENARIANS.
3. I would suggest a multi pronged approach. Application for revision of pension and payment of interest on arrears of pension could be filed with the PPG Department. The inactive Government machinery could be flooded with Applications seeking information under the Right to Information Act 2005. The Circle Pensioners Associations could register in the structured meetings the favourable position contained in the various court orders and judgments. I may quote the favourable points from Rules Court orders etc in next part.
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 26-07-2015 11:31 pm:

 7th bipartite retirees of sbi
DEAR M.GOPALAKRISHNA IYER,
I HAVE TO ADVISE THAT OUR P-ENSION ISSUES REMAIN UNRESOLVED DUETO ADAMANT STAND BEING ADOPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT.THE PRESENT PRECEPTION OF THE OFFICIALS OF THE FINANCE MINISTRY NEEDS TO BE CHANGED.THE PRECEPTION ENTERTAINED BY THE VARIOUS OFFICIALS DEALING WITH OUR PENSION ISSUES OVER THE YEARS IS UNFORTUNATELY PASSED ON TO THEIR SUCCESSORS.OUR BANK IS NOT TAKING ANY DECISION IN REGARD TO PENSION ISSUES OF ITS OWN .OUR PENSION ISSUES WILL BE SOLVED IF GOVERNMENT AGRRE OR VERDICT BY THE APEX COURT(SUPREME COURT) .
K.R.SAINI
 

Jwala prasad tiwari wrote at 26-07-2015 7:49 pm:

 Pension slip not received on email
Sir!I registered my email I'd at ppg Patna but pension slip not being sent on my email Is there any remedy plz advise THANKS
 

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer wrote at 26-07-2015 6:37 pm:

 7TH BPS RETIREES OF SBI.
Dear Shri Saini,

Please refer to your post dated the 26th in support of mine of the same data. I am happy that a learned person like you who is closely monitoring the progress in pensioners cases has appreciated my stand on the plight of 7th BPS retirees.

2. To correct a wrong instruction given in 2000, what is the need to refer the matter to RBI and GOI. People at the helm of affairs including our Chairman are not able to and do not want to take any positive step to redress and address our problems. They are scared of taking decision in our favour.

3. Central Office (Corporate Centre) have written a in April 2015 to rectify the anomalies of 5th 6th and 7th BPS retires. This letter is gathering dust in the Ministry of Finance. "Okey", "We will look into the matter" were the reply given to our PenFed leaders by the Chairman and Minister of State of Finance. Even after a lapse of 3 weeks nothing has happened.

2. We must have some influential politicians like Shri Amit Shah or Shri O. Rajagopal or Shri L.K. Advani or Shri Ram Jetmalalani to pressurise the Finance Minister and get our things done. When the Chairman is very much functionally impotent, we have no other go than approaching outsiders.

Yours faithfully,

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer.

 

Anil K Saxena wrote at 26-07-2015 3:22 pm:

 SBIPA ELECTIONS 2014-2017 - CONGRATULATIONS
CONGRATULATION AND HEARTIEST WELCOME TO OPEN UMBRELLA GROUP FOR THEIR GREATER SUCCESS IN SBIPA (BENGAL CIRCLE) ELECTION 2014 - 2017.THANKS TO ALL VOTER WHO HAVE EITHER SUPPORTED THEM OR SUPPORTED OTHERS FOR THE CAUSE OF PENSIONERS. THE PENSIONERS OF BENGAL CIRCLE ARE UNITED . ELECTION IS OVER, AND EVERY PENSIONER IS WINNER, LET US THINK HOW THE PENSIONERS GRIEVANCE WILL BE REDRESSED
ANIL SAXENA Delegate SBIPA GAYA UNIT.
 

S.RAJAGOPALAN wrote at 26-07-2015 4:41 am:

 7TH BPS RETIREES OF SBI.
Dear friends,
Mr Gopalakrishna Iyer's explanation/clarification-logic wise- in the pension matters are looks so simple. Next what to be done? can we request to Pensioner's Federation to take up the matter with our management? i do not think the matter so simple &it did not strike all concerned so far.
Rajagopalan.s
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 26-07-2015 4:02 am:

 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES.
IN RESPONSE TO M.GOPALAKRISHNA IYER COMMENT DATED THE 26TH JULY,2015 IT MEANS FAULT WITH THE BANK FOR ISSUING WRONG INSTRUCTIONS IN 2000 AND DUE TO THIS 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES ARE SUFFERING.GOVERNMENT SHOULD RECTIFY THE MISTAKE IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT LOSS OF TIME.
K.R.SAINI
 

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer wrote at 26-07-2015 3:32 am:

 7TH BPS RETIREES OF SBI.
Dear Friends,

This is with reference to Shri K.R.Saini's post of the 25th. The irregularity in 7th BPS retirees, that they are paid pension as per 6th BPS, was a mistake committed by the then Chairman Shri G.G. Vaidya. To correct that anomaly, what is the big need to take permission/get approval of Government of India or Reserve Bank of India. It is just a matter of natural justice that a person who retires during the currency of a particular BPS is paid pension based on that BPS. Such a simple mistake is lingering on since 17 years. The Chairman, The Minister of State for Finance everybody has given a patient hearing to our Federation leaders who returned with optimism. Still nothing tangible has yet been done.

2. Secondly, retirees both pre 1-11-2002 and post 2002 are all paying the same price for grocery, vegetables, milk, travelling etc and hence it is only a matter of human sympathy that the benefit of 100% nutralisation of D.A. is extended to all pensioners alike. This facility is available to even RBI pensioners who retired before 1.11.2002.

3. Our bureaucracy is a merciless one. They misguide the political leadership. Once a file goes to them, it never sees sunlight and dies a natural death with nobody to mourn, in some hidden corner of the Central Government Secretariat.

4. Governments may change; but bureaucracy remains the same. Whether UPA or NDA, it is nothing other than OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLE.

5. Better late than never. This is applicable to wisdom (of bureaucrats) also.

Yours faithfully,

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer.
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 25-07-2015 10:04 pm:

 court cases
THERE IS SOMETHING TERRIBLLY WRONG INDEED WITH THE EXISTING POLICY ON BANK PENSION,THE FEDERATION OF SBI PENSIONERS ALONG WITH ITS ALL 14 AFFILIATES HAS BEEN RUNNING FROM PILLAR TO POST FOR THE LAST 27YEARS(W.E.F 1.11.1987) TO SET THE MATTER RIGHT.IN THIS PROCESS 40 % OF THE PENSIONERS HAVE DIED(5TH,6TH AND 7TH BIPARTITE RETIREES ONLY)AND THE REMAINING SURVIVING PENSIONERS ARE IN THE AGE GROUP OF 70 TO 85 YEARS OLD AND GETTING LESS THAN RS20000/PER MONTH AS PENSION DURING THIS PERIOD OF HIGH INFLATION AND THEYARE NOT GETTING 100% D.A NEUTRALISTION IN THEIR ADVANCED AGE .WE ARE DEMANDING EQUITY,FAIR PLAY AND NATURAL JUSTICE IN THE WHOLESYSTEM.
K.R.SAINI
 

S.RAJAGOPALAN wrote at 25-07-2015 3:17 pm:

 court case
I REALLY APPRECIATE MR SAINI'S EXPECTATIONS AS HE IS STILL HOPING, OUR COURT CASE W.P(C)1875/2013 IS GOING TO COME UP FOR HEARING!
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 25-07-2015 6:31 am:

 W.P (C)1875/2013
AS PER WEB SITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT THE ABOVE NOTED COURT CASE HAS BEEN LISTED ON THE 27TH JULY,2015 AT SERIAL NO 1 A BEFORE A DOUBLE BENCH NO 5.
K.R.SAINI
 

M.Gopalakrishna Iyer wrote at 25-07-2015 4:58 am:

 7TH BPS RETIREES OF SBI.
Dear Friends,

Anybody who retires during the currency of a particular BPS draws pension based on the basic pay applicable as per the BPS. But only in the case of 7th BPS retires of SBI, pension is based on the basic pay of 6th BPS. A pig-headed Chairman by name G.G. Vaidya did such an idiotic act. To correct the mistake, there is no big need to take permission of RBI or GOI. By a simple resolution of the Board of Directors a circular can be sent to all Circles. There is no need to obtain permission from GOI or RBI to correct a mistake.

2. Hypocracy has a limit; this anomaly can be rectified within a week if our Chairman is sincere to the purpose.

Yours faithfully,

M. GoALAKRISHNA iYER.
 

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer wrote at 24-07-2015 10:04 pm:

 DELHI HIGH COURT CASE No.1875/2013
Dear Friends,

After summer vacation, Delhi High Court opened on 29th June 2015. Right from that day our case continues to be listed as item No,1-A in Court No.
5, a division bench.

2. Although now it is four weeks, no hearing appears to have taken place. Number of pensioners are decreasing by at least 5 every week. Death of an equal number of family pensioners often goes unnoticed. In the process, when the final judgement comes there will be nobody alive among 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th BPS pensioners.

3. Let us, therefore, set aside all our hopes so that at the fag end of our life we do not become lunatic (mentally sick).

Long live our judiciary; long live adjournments.

Yours faithfully,

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer.
 

Ravindra Kumar Syal wrote at 24-07-2015 9:43 pm:

 Medical Facility
Medical facility should given to all the Pensioners.whatsoever be the reason, whether he is retired pensioner or not. Every pensioners should be treated at par with all in all respects. It is a human treatment not that ,that only retired at the age of 60 are the only pensioners. One thing more if the Assn./Federation is taking only 60 yrs. retired person only the real pensioners and only these pensioners are eligible to survive then there is only Ass./ Fed. For only these person and not for others wit a view let other die without any medical facility. My request is, Pl. think it over with an humanity ground.
 

Gautam Dhar wrote at 24-07-2015 8:30 pm:

 revised pension as per 10th bipartite settlement of wage revision
I want to know when revised pension as per 10th bipartite settlement of wage revision will pay to eligible sbi pensioneers.Earlier during manual time at a time existing employee as well as pensioneers benefit is to pay manually from the branch. Now after computerization it should pay more earlier than manual time, but sorry to say that after computerization its taking more time than manual time.Though after 90 days existing employees only got revised salary & allowances and arrears but there is no news for pensioners. why pensioners don't need money, they does not have any requirements? so please inform me when bank will pay that revised pension and arrears too also. thanking you.
 

BS Chahal wrote at 24-07-2015 6:08 pm:

 Pension issue of 5 6 and 7 BP retirees
I FULLY AGREE WITH MR RAJAGOPALAN WHAT HE HAS WRITTEN IN HIS MAIL. I DONOT UNDERSTAND WHY OUR FEDERATION HAS ACCEPTED LOWER PENSION FOR 7TH RETIREES.NOW WHEN OUR CHAIRMAN HAS SAID THAT SHE IS WORRIED FOR 7TH BP RETIREES WHY OUR LEADERS HAS NOT ASKED HER TO BRING 7TH BP RETIREES AT PAR WITH OTHER RETIREES AND ISSUE NECESSARY INSTRUCTIONUS FOR RELEASE OF THE PENSION. IF COURT CASE WAS HURDLE WE SHOULD HAVE WITHDRAWN THIS DEMAND FROM OUR CASE IN ORDER TO SETTLE THE ISSUE. IT NOT LATE EVEN NOW THIS CAN BE DONE.OUR LAWYER SHOULD TALK TO THE BANK'S LAWYER AND ARRANGE ACCORDINGLY WHO CAN VERY WELL CONSULT OUR CHAIRMAN.I EXPECT A REPLY FROM FEDERATION..ALL 7TH RETIREES ARE ANXIOUS TO HEAR FROM YOU.
 

S.RAJAGOPALAN wrote at 24-07-2015 4:42 am:

 PENSION MATTER
MR SAINI JI,
IT IS EVIDENT THAT EVERYBODY(GOVT/BANK/AWARD&OFFICERS FEDERATIONS,PENSIONERS FEDEARIONS,COURTS ARE PLAYING HIDE &SEEK GAME LEAVING ALL THE PENSIONERS OF 5 TO 7 TH BIPARTITE PENSIONERS IN A LURCH.WE,THE POOR PENSIONERS ARE HELPLESS,EXPECTING EVERY MORNING THAT SOMETHING WILL EMERGE AND SIMULTANEOUSLY PUTTING ONE FOOT EVERYDAY TOWARDS THE GRAVE.THIS IS THE FACT. MANY REMARK JUSTICE IS BLIND;PITY THOSE IN HER SWAY,SHOCKED TO DISCOVER SHE IS ALSO DEAF.YES,JUSTICE IS A FADING LIGHT.


 

Mansur N.B wrote at 24-07-2015 3:36 am:

 Chairman's recommendations to GOI on pension matters.
Kindly brief me about the recommendations, and latest developments with regard to 7th bpt retirees. It appears the case No.1875/13 of Delhi H/C was to be heard today i.e. 24/7
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 23-07-2015 7:47 pm:

 CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE,2015
I HAVE TO ADVISE THAT CPI FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE ,2015WILL BE PUBLISHED ON THE 31ST JULY,2015 AND THEN YOU CAN CALCULATE THE D.A W.E F 1.08.2015FOR PENSIONERS.
K.R.SAINI
 

S.RAJAGOPALAN wrote at 23-07-2015 10:55 am:

 DA increase wef 01/08/2015
CPI(IW) for June2015 will be released by the GOI only on 31/7/2015.So it will be known only thereafter.Normally GOI will release the Consumer Price Index Numbers forAgricultural Labourers&Rural laboures around 20th of every month&for June it was due on 20/07/2015.Surprisingly GOI has not released this index figure till now (1.20am on 24/07/2015)So far no one came with any explanation for the delay!
 

Rabindra mukherjee wrote at 23-07-2015 9:24 am:

 Dearness Relief
How much DR will increase for the next month?
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 23-07-2015 4:13 am:

 W.P(C)1875/2013
AS PER WEB SITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT,THE ABOVE NOTED COURT CASE HAS BEEN LISTED ON THE 24TH JULY,2015 AT SERIAL NO 1 A BEFORE A DOUBLE BENCH NO 5.
K.R.SAINI
 

Amitava Goswamy wrote at 22-07-2015 11:46 pm:

 WP(C)1875/2013
Despite Hon'ble Supreme Courts specific instruction to decide the case within a time frame of 6 months, still no serious development took place. Only God knows when the case will be heard. Justice delayed is also justice denied.
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 22-07-2015 8:24 pm:

 W.P(C) 1875/2013 LISTING
IN RESPONSE TO N.SUBRAMANIAN ,I HAVE TO ADVISE THAT I AM KEEPING WATCH ON THE SITUATION FROM THE WEB SITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT.OUR MATTER(W.P(C)1875/2013) WILL CONTINUE TO BE LISTED DAILY TILL IT IS HEARD FINALLY AND DISPOSED OF.IT APPEARS AS PER COURTRULES EVERY DAY THE COURT CASES AT ADMISSION STAGE BE HEARD FIRST AND REGULAR CASES AFTERWARDS IF TIME PERMIT AND COURT TIMING IS 10A.M TO 4.00P.M DAILY.THE ABOVE NOTED CASE IS IN THE REGULAR CATEGORY.
K.R.SAINI
 

N.Subramanian wrote at 22-07-2015 6:24 pm:

 HC Delhi Case Listing
Referring to Mr Keshav's post ,in the HC Registry the case has been diarised and listed in amongst the first 5s for over a period which does'nt however mean that the case will be taken up for hearing on that day. We have to checkup whether the counsels from the Fedn's side and Bank's side are appearing and are present in the court daily. If the case although listed why it is being heard is another question for there should be strong reasons for it.Can Mr Keshav , as he is closely following up the case may be able to find out the reason and post it in this column as we are very eager to know the reason . Thanks to Mr Keshav for his tracking the development of the case in the HC.
 

KESHAV RAIBSAINI (Website) wrote at 22-07-2015 7:42 am:

 W.P(C)1875/2013
AS PER WEB SITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT THE ABOVE NOTED CASE HAS BEEN LISTED ON THE 23RD JULY,2015 AT SERIAL NO 1 A BEFORE DOUBLE BENCH NO 5.
K.R.SAINI
 

BS Chahal wrote at 22-07-2015 3:32 am:

 7th BPS RETIREES
Let us first fight for 5. 6.7 retirees first and ask the bank to bring them at par with other retirees pension for which our Chairman is already anxious and She has already sent her recommendations to GOI.We can fight for other demand after that.I think the Bank and GOI and court will immediately accept to this. We should ask our lawyer to add this prayer in our plaint.
 

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer wrote at 22-07-2015 2:37 am:

 5TH 6TH 7TH 7 8TH BPS RETIREES
Dear Friends,

Please refer to the post of date by Shri Sujay Ghosh.

If we can have a meeting with Shri Amit Shah, President of B.J.P., the matter will receive the immediate attention of our Prime Minister and Finance Minister and a quick decision will be taken by them in our favour by overlooking or sidelining the bureaucracy.

2. I request our leaders to consider my suggestion seriously.

Yours sincerely,

M. Gopalakrishna Iyer.
 

Sujoy Ghosh (Website) wrote at 22-07-2015 12:03 am:

 7th.BPs--Parl.Session
Mr. Mani is on the right track.The MPs may be requested to bring the issue to the notice of the FM. AIADMK MPs would be the best persons to help us on this issue.Sujoy Ghosh
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 21-07-2015 4:35 am:

 W.P(C) 1875/2013
AS PER WEB SITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT THE ABOVE NOTED COURT CASE HAS BEEN LISTED AT ITEM NO 1 A ON THE 22ND JULY,2015 BEFORE A DOUBLE BENCH NO 5
K.R.SAINI
 

S.V.Mani wrote at 20-07-2015 10:42 pm:

 revised pension
Do not miss golden oppourtunity. Parliament is in session. Our Federation leaders should solicit the support of AISBOF General Secretary ShriY.Sudarshan, Presiden D>TFranco Rajendra Dev, and along with them to get the support atleat 4 MPS to raise quesstions in both houses of LOK Sabha and Rajya Sabha to draw the attention of MOF on this pending matter for more than 15 years and 3 BS (8,9,10th) have concluded without clinching the issue. Both the leaders are matured, influential, have negotiating skill and can tackle the outstanding issue very well. This is the only way to presurise the GOI. Otherwise the unsettled matter of Pension revision will go to either cold storage or dust bin. Mani
 

KESHAV RAI SAINI (Website) wrote at 20-07-2015 4:19 am:

 W.P(C)1875/2013
AS PER WEBSITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT THE ABOVE NOTED CASE HAS BEEN LISTED ON THE21STJULY,2015 AS ITEM NO 1 A.
K.R.SAINI
 

N.Radhakrishnan wrote at 20-07-2015 1:23 am:

 Supreme court bench verdict for LIC pensioners
not be less than 50% of basic pension in the minimum of the pay sacle band correspondin to the to the pre revised pay sacle . Pension is not abounty or welfare measure as our Ass.STaff union tell as Jalra to IBA
 

S.V.Mani wrote at 19-07-2015 10:28 pm:

 bonus
It will be wiser too suggest that the Banks recommendations to GOI for 3% bonus, stock option etc., from profit should have been 5% out of which 2% share to the Retirees who had also contributed business growth and Bank's overall devlopment. Though the DMDs recommendation for revised Pension to 5,6,7th BS Retirees is pending for approval since 3 months, Bonus recommendastion may get preference to others. Afterall, the Banks profit goes to GOI and income Tax Dept. Therefore sharing of 2% by the Retirees is not a bad idea. Mani
 

V MADHAVAN wrote at 19-07-2015 7:59 pm:

 SBI VRS Optee2000. Supreme Court Judgment DT 26 02 2015 Civil Appeal No 2463 / 2015
Dear SRDAGA This has reference to the writing on19-07-2015 on this site under the caption SBI VRS Optee2000. Supreme Court Judgment DT 26 02 2015 Civil Appeal No 2463 / 2015: In then said judgment itself it is explained “The Indian Banks Association (I.B.A.), after obtaining approval from the Government of India evolved a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (V.R.S.) and the appellant-Bank adopted the Scheme with certain modifications, despite it having its own Voluntary Retirement Scheme in the existing service conditions meant for its employees to seek voluntary retirement/premature retirement/resignation. The Scheme, namely, S.B.I. Voluntary Retirement Scheme (for short ‘the Scheme’) was adopted by the State Bank of India on 29.12.2000.” Among other benefits it is stated in the SBIVRS that Pension in terms of State Bank of India Employees’ Pension Fund Rules on the relevant date (including commuted value of pension). SBIVRS is a contract by offer. The optees accepted the offer contained in SBIVRS.
The provisions of 7th Bipartite Settlements were incorporated in the SBI Officers Service Rules by the Central Board of the Bank in its meeting dated 28.11.2001. On the nominated date of exit namely 31 03 2001 the 6th BPS scale of pay was salary according to SBI Officers Service Rule.
In the light of the above presents it may not be prudent to equate the SBIVRS optees with the VRS optees of other Banks. Already two High Courts have elaborately analysed the SBI employees Pension Rule 1955 and upheld the issue that pension is to be calculated on the basis of 7th BPS salary only. It is for the Readers and Leaders to pressurise the management to implement the court orders.
With regards vmadhavan67@yahoo.in
 

SRDAGA wrote at 19-07-2015 5:42 am:

 SBI VRS Optee2000. __Supreme Court Judgment DT 26022015 Civil AppealNo 2463 / 2015
Above supreme Court judgment says that all the VRS Opted of the public sector banks including SBI forms homogeneous group and their rules of pension can not be differ. As the VRS2 000scheme was prepared by Iba under instructions from the Central govt of India applicable for all public sector banks including SBI. Why the VRS opted of SBI is getting their pension on the basis of 6th bipartite settlement where as others are getting on basis of 7th bipartite settlement. Is it not aviolation of Court by SBI . Please highlite on this matter
 

SRDAGA wrote at 19-07-2015 5:28 am:

 SBI VRS Optee2000. __Supreme Court Judgment DT 26022015 Civil AppealNo 2463 / 2015
Above supreme Court judgment says that all the VRS Opted of the public sector banks including SBI forms homogeneous group and their rules of pension can not be differ. As the VRS2 000scheme was prepared by Iba under instructions from the Central govt of India applicable for all public sector banks including SBI. Why the VRS opted of SBI is getting their pension on the basis of 6th bipartite settlement where as others are getting on basis of 7th bipartite settlement. Is it not aviolation of Court by SBI . Please highlite on this matter
 

< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >


go to top